Private:Surveillance - Revision history

Mbagheri at 21:49, 4 April 2008

2008-04-04T21:49:15Z

Mbagheri at 22:18, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T22:18:10Z

Mbagheri at 22:06, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T22:06:03Z

Mbagheri at 17:31, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T17:31:29Z

Mbagheri at 18:49, 1 April 2008

2008-04-01T18:49:37Z

Mbagheri at 19:20, 31 March 2008

2008-03-31T19:20:55Z

Mbagheri at 01:25, 31 March 2008

2008-03-31T01:25:14Z

Mbagheri at 02:31, 29 March 2008

2008-03-29T02:31:01Z

Mbagheri at 02:22, 29 March 2008

2008-03-29T02:22:52Z

Mbagheri at 02:21, 29 March 2008

2008-03-29T02:21:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 4 April 2008
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* [http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg-7/mpeg-7.htm MPEG-7 Overview]		* [http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg-7/mpeg-7.htm MPEG-7 Overview]
	* [http://www.chiariglione.org/MPEG/technologies/mp07-rsw/index.htm MPEG-7 Reference Software]		* [http://www.chiariglione.org/MPEG/technologies/mp07-rsw/index.htm MPEG-7 Reference Software]
		+	* [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/76/20050/00927422.pdf?isNumber=20050 The MPEG-7 visual standard for content description-an overview]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 2 April 2008
Line 31:		Line 31:
	==Useful Links==		==Useful Links==
	* [http://www.eptascape.com/index.htm Eptascape Surveillance Systems]		* [http://www.eptascape.com/index.htm Eptascape Surveillance Systems]
		+	* [http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg-7/mpeg-7.htm MPEG-7 Overview]
		+	* [http://www.chiariglione.org/MPEG/technologies/mp07-rsw/index.htm MPEG-7 Reference Software]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 2 April 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:

	[http://nsl.cs.sfu.ca/video/library/CBC/doc-reality.wmv Video 4] is a segment of a documentary from CBC. It shows that the summarization technique performs well on different types of video.		[http://nsl.cs.sfu.ca/video/library/CBC/doc-reality.wmv Video 4] is a segment of a documentary from CBC. It shows that the summarization technique performs well on different types of video.
		+
		+
		+	==Useful Links==
		+	* [http://www.eptascape.com/index.htm Eptascape Surveillance Systems]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/category/surveillance-video-samples CCTV Camera Pros]
-[http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/surveillance-video-samples/30-frames-per-second.html Video 1] shows a day view of a car, someone approaches the car and steals something from inside and runs away. [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/surveillance-video-samples/cctv-camera-recording.html Video 2] is similar but shot at night.
+[http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/surveillance-video-samples/30-frames-per-second.html Video 1] shows a day view of a car, someone approaches the car, steals something from inside and runs away. [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/surveillance-video-samples/cctv-camera-recording.html Video 2] is similar but shot at night.
 For all videos the first frames which are totally dark and the final advertisements are dropped and not processed. From each video a %1 summary is produced.
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 </table>
-Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, we guess that the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. To verify our guess, we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene. Since the key frames from Video 3 does not include the person running away, our guess is incorrect. Longer videos are needed for further investigation.
+Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, we guess that the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. To verify our guess, we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video 1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene. Since the key frames from Video 3 does not include the person running away, our guess is incorrect. Longer videos are needed for further investigation.
 [http://nsl.cs.sfu.ca/video/library/CBC/doc-reality.wmv Video 4] is a segment of a documentary from CBC. It shows that the summarization technique performs well on different types of video.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 <tr>
 <td>#3</td><td>420</td><td>10, 132, 396, 416</td><td>[[media:summary3.bmp | summary3]]</td>
 </tr>
 </table>
-Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, we guess that the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. To verify our guess, we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene. Since the key frames from Video 3 does not include the person running away, our guess is incorrect.
+Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, we guess that the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. To verify our guess, we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene. Since the key frames from Video 3 does not include the person running away, our guess is incorrect. Longer videos are needed for further investigation.
 Longer videos are needed for further investigation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 31 March 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. To verify our guess, we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene. Since the key frames from Video 3 does not include the person running away, our guess is incorrect.		Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. To verify our guess, we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene. Since the key frames from Video 3 does not include the person running away, our guess is incorrect.
		+	Longer videos are needed for further investigation.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 29 March 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	</table>		</table>

−	Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. ~~Therefore~~ we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene.	+	Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. To verify our guess, we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene. Since the key frames from Video 3 does not include the person running away, our guess is incorrect.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 </tr>
 <tr>
-<td>#1</td><td>490</td><td>2, 4, 7, 146, 200</td><td>[[summary1.bmp]]</td>
+<td>#1</td><td>490</td><td>2, 4, 7, 146, 200</td><td>[[media:summary1.bmp | summary1]]</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
-<td>#2</td><td>540</td><td>2, 4, 205, 416, 522</td><td>[[summary2.bmp]]</td>
+<td>#2</td><td>540</td><td>2, 4, 205, 416, 522</td><td>[[media:summary2.bmp | summary2]]</td>
 </tr>
 <tr>
-<td>#3</td><td>420</td><td>10, 132, 396, 416</td><td>[[summary3.bmp]]</td>
+<td>#3</td><td>420</td><td>10, 132, 396, 416</td><td>[[media:summary3.bmp | summary3]]</td>
 </tr>
 </table>
 Summary of Video 1 did not include any frames from the second half of the video. After comparing the sequence with that of Video 2, it was noticed that unlike Video 2, Video 1 starts when the person is in the scene. Therefore, the frames from the second half of the video seem 'normal' and not detected as significant frames. Therefore we tried [http://videos.cctvcamerapros.com/security-camera-videos/ppro-9475-box-camera.html Video 3] which similarly to Video1 is shot in day light but starts with no person in the scene.