Difference between revisions of "Private:progress-dameh"
From NMSL
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== May 5 === | === May 5 === | ||
* Recap | * Recap | ||
− | ** Problem: kernel methods' gram matrix is O(N^2), which is | + | ** Problem: kernel methods' gram matrix is O(N^2), which is computationally and memory usage infeasible for large-scale datasets |
** Previous Work: | ** Previous Work: | ||
*** Low rank matrix approximation: | *** Low rank matrix approximation: |
Revision as of 16:36, 8 May 2011
Summer 2011 (TA)
- Research: Gram Matrix approximation
May 5
- Recap
- Problem: kernel methods' gram matrix is O(N^2), which is computationally and memory usage infeasible for large-scale datasets
- Previous Work:
- Low rank matrix approximation:
- using EigenDecomposition: Optimal solution
- Problem: requires O(N^3) computation to construct the low rank matrix
- Solution: use Nytsrom theorem to approximate the EigenDecomposition of the matrix which requires O(m^2N) where m << N.
- Problem: In this methods in despite of reducing the computation complexity still we need O(N^2) to store the matrix, so the next methods reduce both computation and memory.
- using EigenDecomposition: Optimal solution
- Efficient implementation for computing the kernel matrix:
- Using Spatial Indexing:
- using Z-order, H-order, kd-tress and other spatial indexing techniques to order the points in the space and then using sliding window where the kernel function computed only between points in that window.
- Problems: requires O(NlogN) as preprocessing to order the points, fails for very high dimensional Data and hard to parallel
- Solution: We proposed a method that works fine for large-scale and highly dimensional data that overcomes all pervious works drawbacks, easy to parallel, requires linear time preprocessing and reduce both computation and memory usage down form quadratic to subquadratic:
- Using Spatial Hashing or Locality sensitive hashing: where the kernel function and the cluster methods works on the buckets individually.
- LSH families :
- Random projection:
- Hamming distance, Euclidean Distance, Cosine Distance
- Problem for random projection, assume data uniformly distrubuted and it doesn’t take in account if data are in a kernel space, Solution:
- Spectral Hashing: overcomes previous families problems
- Kernelized LSH : Problem: more complex to compute
- Random projection:
- LSH families :
- Using Spatial Indexing:
- Low rank matrix approximation:
- In progress: Comparing different LSH families
Spring 2011 (TA/RA)
- Courses:
- CMPT 885: Special Topics in Computer Architecture
- CMPT 886: Special Topics in Operating Systems
Fall 2010 (FAS-GF/RA)
- Courses:
- CMPT 705: Design/Analysis Algorithms
- CMPT 820: Multimedia Systems
- Worked on Gram matrix approximation, High Performance/large scale application case studies
Summer 2010 (TA)
- Worked on large Scale Kernel methods
Spring 2010 (RA)
- Courses:
- CMPT 768: Sound Synthesis
- Worked on Locality sensitive hashing families and their applications and implementations