Difference between revisions of "Private:progress-diab"
From NMSL
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''Publications:''' | * '''Publications:''' | ||
− | ** [accepted] K. Diab, T. ElGamal, K. Calagary, and M. Hefeeda, "Storage optimization for 3d streaming systems," in Proc.of ACM | + | ** [accepted] K. Diab, T. ElGamal, K. Calagary, and M. Hefeeda, "Storage optimization for 3d streaming systems," in Proc.of ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys’14), Singapore, March 2014. |
− | Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys’14), Singapore, March 2014. | ||
− | |||
* '''Submissions Plans:''' | * '''Submissions Plans:''' | ||
Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
=== Jan 24=== | === Jan 24=== | ||
− | * | + | * I worked on the camera ready version of our MMSys'14 paper. |
− | * | + | * Currently, I am working on the literature survey for the rate adaptation project. This report should have been delivered tonight, but I couldn't complete all the sections that I want to write. I will deliver it and complete it by the next weekend. |
− | * | + | * For the rate adaptation project: |
+ | ** There had been different approaches in the academia for 2D videos. | ||
+ | ** Rate adaptation for 3D videos are rare. This means -somehow- that we are in the good direction. | ||
+ | ** In the next four weeks, I should take some important decisions. Some questions that I need to answer: | ||
+ | *** Do we need to deal with 3D videos as two different views? and not only as a 2D image. This will let us exploit some facts about 3D videos. | ||
+ | *** There are many objectives that define a "good" rate adaptation algorithms. What objectives do we need to handle in our algorithm? | ||
+ | *** What is the problem definition? | ||
+ | *** How are we going to model the problem and derive the solution? I am thinking of two approaches right now. Optimization problem or Vector space modeling. In both cases, a "good" objective function or a "good" similarity metric should be designed. | ||
+ | *** Human Visual System for 3D perception should be included in the model as well | ||
+ | *** How to evaluate our model? (Simulation, Emulation, real system?) | ||
+ | *** How to integrate such a model with the current system? How to extend the current storage optimization algorithm to support the storage requirements of multiple-bitrate versions? | ||
+ | * For the courses: | ||
+ | ** Multimedia: I will deliver a hierarchical JPEG encoder/decoder implementation next week. I had implemented it using OpenCV. TODO components are: Huffman coding (can use external code), hierarchical flow, GUI and the document. | ||
+ | ** Algorithms: I have a quiz in Feb. 4, 2014. |
Revision as of 23:08, 24 January 2014
Spring 2014 (RA)
- Courses:
- CMPT-705: Design and Analysis of Algorithms
- CMPT-820: Multimedia Systems
- Submissions:
- NA
- Publications:
- [accepted] K. Diab, T. ElGamal, K. Calagary, and M. Hefeeda, "Storage optimization for 3d streaming systems," in Proc.of ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys’14), Singapore, March 2014.
- Submissions Plans:
- ACM Multimedia in March 31, 2014 (http://www.acmmm.org/2014/)
Jan 24
- I worked on the camera ready version of our MMSys'14 paper.
- Currently, I am working on the literature survey for the rate adaptation project. This report should have been delivered tonight, but I couldn't complete all the sections that I want to write. I will deliver it and complete it by the next weekend.
- For the rate adaptation project:
- There had been different approaches in the academia for 2D videos.
- Rate adaptation for 3D videos are rare. This means -somehow- that we are in the good direction.
- In the next four weeks, I should take some important decisions. Some questions that I need to answer:
- Do we need to deal with 3D videos as two different views? and not only as a 2D image. This will let us exploit some facts about 3D videos.
- There are many objectives that define a "good" rate adaptation algorithms. What objectives do we need to handle in our algorithm?
- What is the problem definition?
- How are we going to model the problem and derive the solution? I am thinking of two approaches right now. Optimization problem or Vector space modeling. In both cases, a "good" objective function or a "good" similarity metric should be designed.
- Human Visual System for 3D perception should be included in the model as well
- How to evaluate our model? (Simulation, Emulation, real system?)
- How to integrate such a model with the current system? How to extend the current storage optimization algorithm to support the storage requirements of multiple-bitrate versions?
- For the courses:
- Multimedia: I will deliver a hierarchical JPEG encoder/decoder implementation next week. I had implemented it using OpenCV. TODO components are: Huffman coding (can use external code), hierarchical flow, GUI and the document.
- Algorithms: I have a quiz in Feb. 4, 2014.