Private:energySaving

From NMSL

Outline of our research direction

Investigate impact on gaming quality

- specifically analyze the trade-off between energy savings and gaming quality.
- find paper to model gaming quality.

Improve algorithm from linear model to exponential curve.

- compare performance between existing solutions, linear, and exponential model.

Expand simulation/implementation to different games.

- find reference to prove DR is used in practice.
- Show that our solution is game independent

Expand analysis to include a global view.

- mathematical model
-Performance metric in terms of bandwidth savings, can be calculated from a global view perspective.

Solve receiving mode problems

- Use PSM for AP mode, and rotating host algorithm for ad-hoc.
- Please see Yi's thesis work.

Additional Ideas

- slow down the game to XX fps to allow the game to sleep longer. Without affecting gaming quality.
- see Claypool's papers regarding frame rates and gaming quality.

Energy Savings Overhead

- Investigate energy constraints for nodes with and without our energy savings algorithm.
- fairness in game play/quality.
- have nodes without energy constraints do more work

Other Notes

- Continue to be vague regarding the specific wireless standards. ie. we don't target WiFi or 3G. Instead, we let the reader decides.
- Discover if there is any periodicity of the data and use this to help determine sleep cycles
- Provide strong evidence that our solution helps


To Do's

  1. Address the items above ^
  2. Simulate energy savings using Carson's GLS simulator, please talk to Cameron.
    • We have also modified the GLS code to replay latency traces. Please read our IRS MM'10 paper.
  3. Implement the algorithm into BZFlag.
    • Play a LAN game setup (2 or 3 players) to test the algorithm in energy savings mode
    • Play over the Internet against other players to test algorithm in a mixed environment (with nodes without energy savings)
    • Play over a wireless connection with PSM mode enabled (must use an AP)
    • Play over an Ad-Hoc network setup.
  4. If possible, find an Android open source game and implement the algorithm.
  5. Publish many papers :)


Other ideas

  • If DR is not feasible, most of the items above can be applied to other types of games that do not use DR. Such as:
    • Turn-based games (very long silent periods)
    • Real-time strategy (RTS) games (medium silent periods)
    • Simulation games (medium silent periods, potentially large packet sizes)
    • MMORPG games (World of Warcraft client will soon be available on the Apple iPad)
    • Virtual Reality, such as Second Life.


Addressing NOSSDAV'10 Reviewers Comments

  • Should we use a cummulative moving average or an exponential smoothing one (similar to TCP's RTT estimation)? Moving averages assign equal weights to the observations (i.e. 1/N).
  • We need to quantify the effect/cost of losing updates (while in sleep mode) on game performance (e.g. precision while shooting). In this direction, we can follow an approach similar to that of Claypool's MMSys'10 paper. This effect can also be added to the PMF figure in the paper.
  • Elaborate on the reason behind the spike at 0.1 average error rate in the Fig. 5 bar chart.
  • Base our energy consumption model on a more recent WNIC. If possible, try to find the characteristics of one of the wireless chipsets/interfaces in new Wifi-enabled phones.
  • Modify the source code of some games (possibly those that run on Android phones) that make use of dead reckoning and add our algorithm to them. Create a network of wireless clients and run sessions of the modified game on that network, measuring both power savings and the effect on the quality of experience. Note: if using Android phones, we need to figure out how to obtain the measurements from the device (sending over the network is obviously out of the question because this will conflict with what we want to do in the first place).


References

Please check these references.